Mongolia:

An Early Paraforesters

‘Proof of Concept’

 

Mongolia, Forest User Groups (FUGs) :

 

FUGs are composed largely of herders who were granted rights to manage areas of forest averaging around 3,000 hectares. These forests are dominated by Siberian larch and Scots pine, with some birch.

In principle, the reform was progressive: local people were given responsibility for forests that they depended on and lived alongside.

In practice, however, a fundamental contradiction emerged.

 

Challenges Faced :

 

Most of these forests faced serious ecological pressures, including widespread insect pest outbreaks and increasingly destructive, fast-spreading fires. FUG members could clearly see that many of the stands in their forests were too dense and overstocked, with thick, sometimes impenetrable areas that increased pest vulnerability and fire risk.

The obvious solution was selective thinning.

But here was the problem: under Mongolian regulations, cutting a “green tree” without a formal forestry qualification was illegal. Even when thinning was clearly necessary for forest health, FUG members risked fines or penalties if they carried it out.

In other words, communities had been given responsibility for managing forests—but not the legal authority or skills certification required to do so.

The practical constraint

There was another reality. Most FUG members were herders, whose primary livelihoods depended on their livestock. They could not leave their animals for weeks or months to attend formal forestry training courses in distant towns.

So the challenge became clear:

How could local people gain the professional competence and legal authority needed to manage their forests—without abandoning their livelihoods?

 

A practical solution: short pro-fessional training :

 

So, a pilot initiative, supported by FAO and the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and the Ministry of Environment, tested a simple idea.

Instead of requiring long formal forestry qualifications, short, in-situ training courses were delivered directly to Forest User Groups. These intensive five-day courses were designed to reach a professional forestry standard, with teaching provided by national experts and certified foresters.

Participants learned how to:

𖠰 Assess stand density

𖠰 Plan thinning interventions

𖠰 Carry out pre-commercial thinning safely and effectively

𖠰 Manage harvested poles and residues

Crucially, those who completed the training were formally recognised as qualified to carry out thinning operations.

From penalties to incentives :

This change had an immediate impact.

Once trained and recognised, FUG members were able to legally participate in government-funded pre-commercial thinning programmes. Instead of facing fines, communities were now paid for improving forest health.

Initially the government payment was around USD 45 per hectare. Today it has increased to around USD 120 per hectare, and communities are also able to retain the harvested poles.

Where these approaches were implemented, several outcomes followed:

𖠰 Fire incidence declined

𖠰 Forest condition improved

𖠰 Local ownership strengthened

𖠰 Small forest enterprises began to emerge

What was implemented in Mongolia 10 years ago is essentially an early version of the Paraforester modus operandi!